KMID : 0363119930060010055
|
|
Korean Journal of Pain 1993 Volume.6 No. 1 p.55 ~ p.59
|
|
A Comparison of Patient-Controlled Analgesia and Conventional Intramuscular Opioid Regimen in Relation to their Post-Operative Pain Control and Side Effects
|
|
ÀÌ»óÈÆ
ÀÌÁø°æ/À̱Ôâ/¿ì³²½Ä/ÀÌ¿¹Ã¶
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Using a visual analogus scale, we compare the effect of patient-controlled analgesia and conventional intramuscular opioid regimen in 68 patients undergoing lower abdominal or gynecological surgery. We also recorded the incidence of side effects.
We
checked visual analogue scale 4 hours interval for 30 cases managed by patient-controlled analgesia and 38 cases of conventional intramuscular opioid group managed by patient-controlled analgesia and 38 cases of conventional intramuscular opioid
group
managed by obstetrician. We maintained fentanyl 0.33§¶/kg/hr and set self administrable bolus dose 5.0§¶(lockout interval: 15 min) in patientcontrolled analgesia group. Conventional intramuscular bolus injection group were administered meperidine
50 mg
for 4 hour interval.
Mean visual analogue scale socres obtained by patient-controlled analgesia group and intrameuscular bolus injection group were 2.49¡¾0.67 and 4.53¡¾1.28 (p<0.05). Side effects such as; no significant incidence of respiratory depression, urinary
retention, postural hypotension, nausea. vomiting and pruritus were developed by either groups.
These results suggest that patient-controlled analgesia was more effective method compared with conventional intraumuscular opioid injection regimen for post-operative pain management.
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|